The History of Cotton Strippers
Lowell Carlson
November/December 1974
 |
1. Figure 1: The Hughes patent: combs stripped cotton bolls back into the wagon in back of the stripping unit. [Author's collection]
|
Clarendon College, Box 968, Clarendon, Texas 79226
RELATED CONTENT
D.C. Stover contributed this engine cooling tank
with control valves to gas engine production....
Gas Engine Patents of Note...
Joyner Double-Acting Tandem...
Hvid Engine Combustion...
Rockford Speed Governing...
Southern farmers have been as eager for a machine to harvest
cotton as their northern counterparts were for implements to speed
the production of wheat. Northern grain farmers were aided by the
introduction of Moses and Samuel Pennock's grain drill in 1841
and Cyrus McCormick's reaper in 1831. These inventions came
from Pennsylvania and Virginia respectively, both major grain
states in that period.
No similar technological breakthrough enabled the South to
expand the cotton frontier without large amounts of Negro slavery.
Thus, in part the South's vehemence in defending that
'peculiar institution.' It is ironic that the South should
have gained the cotton gin (1793) to process cotton fibers but was
denied a simple machine to harvest cotton, the greatest bottleneck
of all. If the South had had a cotton harvester would slavery
gradually have disappeared; could the Civil War have been
avoided?
Southerners did design and patent implements for planting and
cultivating cotton. In the 1850's when the agricultural reform
movement was sweeping North Carolina and cotton enjoyed its most
prosperous decade, implement invention ran high. North Carolina
farmers and inventors patented three cotton planters, one
cotton-thinning plow, one cotton cleaning machine, seven plows, ten
cultivators and numerous other implements related to other crops of
the state.
In 1820, the desire to eliminate hand harvesting led a Louisiana
planter to import a cargo of monkeys to train them to pick cotton.
The experiment ended in failure when the monkeys fled into the
woods.
The first patent granted for a cotton harvesting machine was
Samuel S. Rembert and Jedidiah Prescott's, September 10, 1850
patent, number 7,631, subclass 48. The Memphis, Tennessee inventors
described their machine as combining picking cylinders and disks on
horizontal shafts. They anticipated future trends in cotton culture
when they added, 'Our cotton picking machine may be multiplied
and extended to such a width as to embrace several rows of cotton
at once.'
Cotton farmers know the difference between a picker and a
stripper but others may be confused. A picker does just that, it
'picks' the cotton from the boll by means of revolving
spindles. And a picker usually is used more than once since cotton
is a continuous fruiting plant during the growing season. A picker
may make repeated trips through cotton as the bolls ripen.
Cotton strippers, equally old in patent history as pickers, are
used as a once-over harvest machine. Found in areas where weather
conditions prevent repeated harvests, strippers 'pull' the
entire boll, ripe or not.
The devices contrived to harvest cotton can be divided into six
distinct classes:
1. Picker type - includes machines designed to pick open
bolls by means of spindles, fingers or prongs without material
damage to foliage or unopen bolls.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Next >>